Wednesday, November 10, 2010

ETHNIC RELATIONS THE CASE OF MALAYSIA

Self knowledge comes too late and by the time I’ve know myself I am no longer what I was… (Mabel Segun[Nigerian Poet],”the pigeon hole”).

Intro:

· For years, the idea was that modernization would erase ethnicities.

· Why? Because it would not be profitable to pay allegiance to ethnic groups.

· Similarly, it was thought that ethnicity would also come to an end in Africa.

· But, ethnicity has remained and strengthened.

· Most societies are plural societies containing more than one ethnic group.

· Groups do not simply assimilate.

· Ethnic boundaries are not rigid.

· Flows of individuals occur between ethnic groups. Such movement does not have negative consequences.

· Ethnic groups are special kinds of groups, in which experience and expression of identity is situational.

· There are also degrees of ethnic expression.

· Cultural behaviors are not fixed or attached to ethnic groups.

· Ethnic boundaries can give way to other cross-cutting linkages (i.e religion)

· No correlation between objectively identified categories and actual social practice.

Historical Background

· Processes of colonization, decolonization and modernization have influenced ethnicity in Malaysia.

· British East India Company ‘leased’ land from Malaysia in 1786.

· Scottish administrators believed initially that Malays could be ‘improved’, by a system or indirect rule.

No comments:

Post a Comment